Friday, 30 November 2012

Competition watchdogs jump in bed, compare Google probes - Register

Competition watchdogs jump in bed, compare Google probes

FTC chairman to meet EC antitrust boss for talks

Free whitepaper – Operationalizing Information Security

Separate investigations into the business practices of Google are continuing to take place on both sides of the Atlantic and a meeting of minds is set to take place early next week, after the US Federal Trade Commission's chairman flew to Europe for talks with Brussels' competition chief.

The FTC's boss Jon Leibowitz is to speak with the European Commission's antitrust head Joaquin Almunia to discuss their independent probes of Google's search business.

A spokeswoman at Almunia's office confirmed to The Register that the two men would meet to "discuss competition policy matters".

It's understood that the FTC has been pushed to conclude on its findings before the year is out. Meanwhile, here in Europe, Almunia has hit something of a wall with Google's chairman Eric Schmidt.

The EC commissioner has publicly expressed his frustration about how the talks have stalled. In September he growled:

[I]n the absence of satisfactory proposals in the short term – I will be obliged to continue with our formal proceedings.

But since then, Brussels officials have largely gone to ground while Google has continued to attempt to horse-trade with the Commission. Last month, for example, Mountain View was said to have offered to brand its web search results to try to prevent Almunia's office from proceeding with formal action against the company's alleged "abuse of dominance" in the search market.

However, when pressed by El Reg on whether the EC would conclude on its findings soon, we were simply told that "the investigation is still ongoing".

It has been reported, meanwhile, that Leibowitz is heading for the exit door in a few months from now. It's a rumour that appears to be fuelling more urgency on the FTC's part to draw conclusions on its probe of Google as soon as the next few weeks. ®

Free whitepaper – Operationalizing Information Security

England v New Zealand: Chris Robshaw learns lessons - BBC Sport

England captain Chris Robshaw says he has learned lessons from his decisions in defeat to South Africa.

With two minutes left and 16-12 down, Robshaw instructed Owen Farrell to kick for goal rather than go for touch and pursue a potentially match-winning try.

Contrastingly, in a 20-14 loss to Australia the week before, Robshaw was accused of being too adventurous.

"There have been a lot of lessons for myself - whether it is decision-making or other things on the pitch," he said.

"Over the last two weeks, myself and the other players have learned a lot about international rugby.

"We have learned the hard way and unfortunately that happens in sport.

"We have to take those lessons and look forward. We can't be dwelling on what happened the last couple of weeks."

Robshaw's men come up against a world champion All Blacks side ranked as the best in the world in their final autumn international on Saturday.

England are searching for their first win over the New Zealanders since coach Clive Woodward's team prepared for their victorious 2003 World Cup campaign with a 15-13 win in Wellington in June of that year.

As well as being on the wrong side of recent history, England lag far behind the All Blacks in experience with their starting XV having won a total of 206 caps compared to their opponents' collection of 788.

Robshaw says the criticism directed at him in the past couple of weeks has been eased by team-mates who know they will need to be at the top of their game.

"First and foremost I need to go out and perform. As a captain you will be put under pressure in these situations but the whole squad has been terrific and really supportive," he added

"It has been different to previous weeks and it has made me really appreciate the players and coaches and the backroom staff we have at the moment.

"We can't feel sorry for ourselves because if you fall off your game for 10 minutes they will hurt us. They can damage you in 10 seconds."

TEAM LINE-UPS

England: 15-Alex Goode, 14-Chris Ashton, 13-Manu Tuilagi, 12-Brad Barritt, 11-Mike Brown, 10-Owen Farrell, 9-Ben Youngs; 1 -Alex Corbisiero, 2-Tom Youngs, 3-Dan Cole, 4-Joe Launchbury, 5-Geoff Parling, 6-Tom Wood, 7-Chris Robshaw (captain), 8-Ben Morgan.

Replacements: 16-David Paice, 17-Dave Wilson, 18-Mako Vunipola, 19-Courtney Lawes, 20-James Haskell, 21-Danny Care, 22-Freddie Burns, 23-Jonathan Joseph.

New Zealand : 15-Israel Dagg, 14-Cory Jane, 13-Conrad Smith, 12-Ma'a Nonu, 11-Julian Savea, 10-Dan Carter, 9-Aaron Smith; 1-Tony Woodcock, 2-Keven Mealamu, 3-Owen Franks, 4-Brodie Retallick, 5-Sam Whitelock, 6-Liam Messam, 7-Richie McCaw (captain), 8-8-Kieran Read.

Replacements: 16-Dane Coles, 17-Wyatt Crockett, 18-Charlie Faumuina, 19-Luke Romano, 20-Victor Vito, 21-Piri Weepu, 22-Aaron Cruden, 23-Ben Smith.

MATCH OFFICIALS

Referee: George Clancey (Ireland)

Assistant referees: Nigel Owens (Wales) & Lourens van der Merwe (South Africa)

TV: Giulio De Santis (Italy)

Google failed to declare £195m, say Italian police as they launch tax probe - The Guardian

The Italian police have launched a new investigation into the tax affairs of the internet giant Google, which the Rome government said this week had failed to declare revenue totalling more than €240m (£195m).

In answer to a parliamentary question, the finance ministry said Google had also failed to pay almost €100m in VAT.

But a spokesperson for the company said it "respects the tax rules of the countries in which it operates", adding that "until now, we have not received any request to pay additional taxes in Italy".

At the centre of the probe is Google's European base in Dublin and complex arrangements whereby its earnings, royalties and profits are shuttled between Ireland, Bermuda and the Netherlands.

The US Internal Revenue Service has given those arrangements its blessing, but they are coming under ever-greater scrutiny in Europe.

Tax authorities in Britain and France are already looking into Google's affairs and those of other big internet players. On 13 November Amazon said it would fight a €252m French demand for back taxes, interest and penalties. The demand was submitted in connection with "the allocation of income between foreign jurisdictions". Amazon minimises its tax bill in Europe by funnelling its sales through Luxembourg.

In the same way as in other European countries, Google's Italian subsidiary declares as its earnings the payments it receives for its services to the group's headquarters in California and a subsidiary in Ireland. According to Radiocor, an Italian news agency owned by the financial daily Il Sole-24 Ore, Google Italia's 2011 earnings were €3.6m from the US and €40.4m from Dublin.

Its advertising revenues, however, go to Google Ireland Ltd. According to a report in the Irish Times, part is then sent as royalties to a Dutch subsidiary, which in turn passes most of it to a holding company in Bermuda where there is no corporation tax. As the money goes via the Netherlands, another EU country, no withholding tax is due to the Irish authorities. The arrangement is known to tax experts as a "double Irish-Dutch sandwich".

Google nevertheless pays tax in both European jurisdictions, as it does in Italy. According to Radiocor its 2011 tax bill was €1.8m. The latest investigation only concerns earnings in the period from 2002 to 2006. These have already been the subject of an inquiry, carried out in 2007.

The company said: "It is normal for a company to be subject to tax inspections and we have been working with the Italian authorities for some time."

With the non-party government of Mario Monti spearheading a drive to eliminate Italy's budget deficit, officials have stepped up their efforts to boost tax revenues from companies and individuals alike.

Google has also been targeted in Australia where the government has announced new draft tax laws designed to clamp down on big companies that use offshore vehicles to avoid higher local taxes.

Google's New Disavow Tool Offers Online Businesses a Potential Clean Slate - bit-tech.net

In October 2012, Google released their disavow tool; enabling webmasters to disavow (deny any responsibility or support for) certain links from other websites pointing to their own site – namely, any spam or totally irrelevant links which potentially are causing their website to be penalised by Google since the release of their Penguin algorithm update in April 2012.

The Penguin update to Google's algorithm was launched to help target webspam by decreasing the search result rankings for sites that violate Google's quality guidelines, especially in terms of links. However, some websites seem to have been penalised who don't consider themselves to be engaging in any spam. Since this update, some webmasters have claimed it's now easier than ever for reputable websites to be affected by competitors' targeted spam link building against them.

If your website has ever been connected to linkspam, you may have received a message through Google's 'Webmaster Tools' regarding "unnatural links" pointing to your site. Google sends this message when they see evidence of sites using link schemes that violate their quality guidelines, and recommends that those receiving these messages remove as many low-quality links pointing to their website as possible. Even when webmasters try to remove these links by contacting the sites that the links are from, is still possible that there are some links left that can't be eradicated. After all, no webmaster can control what every other website on the Internet links to.

Google's disavow tool has been designed help resolve this, and its development is great news for any websites that have fallen victim to 'negative internet marketing' being undertaken by competitors or black hat agencies against them; building spam links to their site in a deliberate effort to try and get them penalised by Google. The disavow tool allows webmasters to source these unnatural links and simply deny any connection to them.

In 2012 Google amended their stance on the subject of 'negative internet marketing' from more or less the denial of its existence, to accepting it can happen, and vowing to try and prevent it. It seems that this amendment and the development of the disavow tool are Google's way of admitting that negative internet marketing techniques do exist, and need to be combated.

It's a reality that webmasters need do all of the legwork if they have been sent an "unnatural links" warning; telling Google which links are spam as and when they are removed. This could well be a way for Google to vary their data on what makes a link 'spam' or 'real'. They ask Webmasters to identify the links that they think fall outside of Google's guidelines rather than specifically identifying these links for them. Thus Google can see which links the webmasters choose to disavow and incorporate this kind of data into their own algorithm in updates in the future.

Some internet marketing companies, such as SEO Consult, specialise in providing services geared towards natural link building techniques; taking the stance that natural linking is the key to overall internet marketing success. Other sites linking to yours because of excellent and useful content is the way forward, and the development of Google's disavow tool only further shows the search engine's steadfast belief this viewpoint.

By engaging in natural link building, you are also helping to protect your site's image. Users may stumble across spam links pointing to your site on the web and jump to negative conclusions about your website or business, but the disavow tool allows such businesses to remove these links, gain a blank slate and help protect their business' reputation.

If you would like to find out more about SEO Consult, or their range of organic link building services, please visit their website at http://www.seoconsult.com.

Bing claims Google product search leaves online shoppers Scroogled - Internet Marketing News

PPC - Mouse pointer over a Buy button

Search is turning nasty: just in time for Christmas.

Microsoft's Bing has launched a scathing attack on Google's Shopping search service. It has set up a site, Scroogled.com, which claims Google is misleading shopping search customers.

Entitled Don't Get Scroogled, the vicious online PR campaign aims to debase trust in Google's search engine by intimating that they do not provide "honest" search results for shoppers.

Bing claims Google presents its Shopping search results as organic: when they are actually paid ads.

And that, says Bing, means Google searchers are getting "Scroogled". Bing imputes this makes Google dishonest, and pleads: "For an honest search, use Bing".

Bing has posted a series of quotes on the site, mainly from Google's founders, Sergey Brin and Larry Page, claiming to underpin a change in attitude at the search giant since its launch 14 years ago.

They start with the famous "Don't be evil" mantra: which Bing claims went out the window in May 2012 when Google announced it would start charging for inclusion in Shopping searches in the US.

There's a short timeline of events leading up to the monetisation of Shopping, too, which Bing claims shows that Google has built a "purely commercial model".

A video, explaining that Google Shopping search results are all ads, accompanies two images of frazzled-looking models who may, or may not, have been Scroogled, on the page, as well as an explanation of "How Google Does It" and "Bing's Position".

Share buttons for social media networks invite people to "Warn their friends."

And in a final dig, Bing claims: "For an honest search result, try Bing."

As far as marketing goes, this is about as nasty as it's got so far between the two tech giants jostling for position (away from the antitrust suits and on-going patent wars, which aren't funded by marketing budgets).

But already, Bing's bold claims have been pulled under the microscope: as it too, provides paid ads in its apparently organic Shopping results. And, for the last two years running, Bing has apparently frozen all non-paid listings in the run-up to Christmas.

Google Shopping phased out the free side of its service in the US in October. The same is set to happen in the UK early next year.

Google announced the move to an exclusively pay-to-play model back in May – which Bing claims was an 'under the radar' announcement, and says is somewhat contradictory to Google's previous mantra: "Don't be evil."

Whilst Bing's marketing department has focused on all the perceived wrongdoings of their bitter arch-rival, Scroogled.com fails to fully explain how Bing's own shopping process works, whilst also smoothing over some of the finer details of Google's shopping algorithm.

For instance, Bing accuses Google of running a "pay to rank" system, which isn't strictly true. In fact, all merchants wanting to appear in Google Shopping have to pay: and it's not simply a case of "whomever pays most gets highest" in the results.

Much like with PPC ads, Google uses a host of ranking factors to decide which results to display, and where, with landing pages and quality score most likely to be taken into consideration.

In Bing, merchants have a choice: free listings, or Bing's "recommended" option, inclusion in Shopping.com.

And, for that recommendation, merchants will have to pay.

So, essentially, the big difference at the moment is this: Google shopping results are all paid ads. Some of Bing's shopping results are paid ads.

So why the muck-throwing?

Stefan Weitz, a senior director at Bing, tried to explained Scroogled in clearer detail.

He is reported to have said: "Bing includes millions of free listings from merchants, and rankings are determined entirely by which products are most relevant to your query.

"While merchants can pay fees for inclusion on our third-party shopping sites, and subsequently may appear in Bing Shopping through partnerships we have, we do not rank merchants higher based on who pays us, nor do we let merchants pay to have their product offers placed higher in Bing Shopping's search results."

Weitz accepts that merchants can indeed pay for using the Bing Shopping service, but in the case of Google Shopping, payment is the only option, making Bing different from its competitor.

This, Bing claims, is not properly communicated to Google shoppers, and is the underlining reason behind their claims that Google shopping searchers are getting Scroogled.

Weitz did, however, also concede to Danny Sullivan at Search Engine Land, that: "We need to do a better job explaining the shopping system".

News brought to you by ClickThrough – experts in SEO, PPC, Multilingual Search Marketing and Website Conversion Enhancement services.

Did you find this page useful?

Comments

comments

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Google 'Scroogling' users with Shopping search results, warns Microsoft - ITProPortal


Microsoft is once again going after Google and its search engine, but the software giant is now focusing on Google's shopping results.

Microsoft's Bing team has launched a website, dubbed Scroogled, that takes Google to task for turning its shopping results into a commercial endeavour.

"Google Shopping is nothing more than a list of targeted ads that unsuspecting customers assume are search results," the Bing team said.

In May, Google announced that it would transition its US Google Product Search "to a purely commercial model." The new effort, renamed Google Shopping, has been rolling out throughout the autumn.

"We believe that having a commercial relationship with merchants will encourage them to keep their product information fresh and up to date," Sameer Samat, Google's vice president of product management, said in a blog post. "Higher quality data - whether it's accurate prices, the latest offers or product availability - should mean better shopping results for users, which in turn should create higher quality traffic for merchants."

At the same time, Google said it was experimenting with new ways to display product results on Google.com, including larger images and the ability for more granular searches.

"These new formats are clearly labeled 'sponsored,' and take space currently occupied by AdWords," Samat wrote.

Naturally, Redmond thinks Bing is a better option. "We say that when you limit choices and rank them by payment, consumers get Scroogled. For an honest search result, try Bing."

The Scroogled site features large buttons that let users "Try Bing" or "Make Bing your homepage." Microsoft is also asking people to share their "bad search" stories on its Facebook page.

"Google Shopping makes it easier for shoppers to quickly find what they're looking for, compare different products and connect with merchants to make a purchase," Google said in a statement today. "With new 360-degree, interactive product images, social shopping lists and a fast growing inventory of more than a billion products worldwide, Google is a great resource for shoppers to find what they need, at great prices for their loved ones this holiday season."

In September, Microsoft launched the "Bing It On" campaign, which let web users enter a search and see side-by-side comparisons of Bing and Google search results. "Our mission is to show people it's time to break the 'Google habit' and that Bing has reached a quality level that will make it easy to switch," Microsoft said at the time.

iOS apps still more profitable than Android, but Google Play is gaining - TechRadar UK

Google Play seems to be going on one heck of a growth spurt. According to new stats, the Android app store is catching up to iOS fast.

Even though the Apple App Store is four times more profitable than Google Play, iOS can't match Android's revenue growth of 311 percent since January and 17.9 percent in the last month.

In contrast, Apple's app revenue has increased only 12.9 percent this year and shrunk 0.7 percent in the last month.

The numbers come from a report published by app store analytics firm, App Annie, which also dishes some stats concerning how the pair square off in free app downloads.

Where they stand

Apple still leads Google Play with 10 percent more volume of global free apps downloaded. But once again, Google Play's growth impresses at 48 percent in the last five months, compared to a 3.3 percent growth for Apple in the free app market.

"The gap between global revenue on iOS and Google Play is still there," said Bertrand Schmitt, App Annie CEO, in a press release about the report.

"But the gap is shrinking every month, creating more opportunities for publishers to generate significant revenue growth in several countries on Google Play."

Play grows like a weed

Though Google Play is the new app store on the block, it has been growing rapidly since it ditched the Android Market name back in March.

After that, Google started selling apps, games, books, music and movies under the Play brand and has been steadily adding new features and partners.

Since its debut, the Google Play store has put a few notches on the wall as well. In September, it hit the 25 billion downloads millstone. And in October, Google Play offered 700,000 app for download, matching the number of apps available for iOS.

It's an Android thang

But the numbers jump may have more to do with the popularity of Android rather than Google Play's facelift.

The Android OS has been taking sizable bites out of Apple's tablet market share recently. In October, iOS control of the tablet market dropped to 50.4 percent, which was about even with Android. Each operating system also shipped about 14 million tablets in the third quarter of 2012, according to IDC.

"Although, in the most recent month, growth has slowed considerably, and the question remains, can Google Play keep growing at a lightning pace?" the App Annie report read.

And that is the question going forward. It seems that Apple has hit its market saturation, as Android and Google Play still have room to grow.

One analyst thinks Android will gain the upper hand sometime in mid-2013, and gain control of the tablet market. If Android can sustain growth at the pace it has been, it could very well match or even surpass Apple's market share.

With Google's Nexus 10 and Amazon's 7-inch Kindle Fire HD challenging the newly released iPad and iPad mini, this holiday seasons should be a good glimpse of how the Android vs. iOS battle will play out.

Google's Drive + Gmail: A 10GB Dropbox killer - Register

Open ... and Shut In the realm of digital overlords, Google just took one more step toward being the lord of all.

While Google+ has failed to draw crowds as a social network, Google has made collaboration through existing networks exceptionally easy. This week Google introduced the ability to send supersized email attachments of up to 10GB. In so doing, Google has simultaneously driven a small spike into the heart of file-syncing services like Dropbox, while also reestablishing the lowly inbox as ground zero for content storage and collaboration.

I love Dropbox, and have used it in both the personal and corporate contexts. At work, it's a great way to share folders with colleagues as we collaborate on presentations or other files. It's also a convenient way to keep a digital storage locker across my different devices.

But it's primarily at home that I use Dropbox, and almost always to share large files with friends. The downside to this approach is that, as easy as it is to get started with Dropbox, and as well as Dropbox explains why and how people should use it, it's simply not as easy or familiar as email. With Google's slick integration of Google Drive with Gmail, I suspect my use of Dropbox will plummet, as it's simply easier to "email" the files to friends rather than sending them links to those files.

Yes, when I send a 10GB "attachment" through Google's new Gmail feature, I'm really sending them a link to a Google Drive-hosted file, the same as Dropbox. But the Google's seamless integration sets its approach apart, and it's what I'll be using with my non-techie friends.

I doubt I'm alone. Most of the non-tech world still hasn't discovered Dropbox, and likely won't need to given that many already use their email as a file system of sorts.

As Bruce Schneier writes, today's technology user "pledges allegiance to the United States of Convenience". While Apple takes the pain out of the mobile experience by seamlessly integrating hardware and software, Google is going a step further by integrating our digital existence across disparate devices through its sync services, Gmail, Google Drive, and more. By embedding file storage deep into Gmail, Google is giving users one more compelling reason to store their content in Google's cloud, knowing that sharing such content is as easy as email.

Rory O'Driscoll, partner with Scale Venture Partners and an investor in Box, a file-sync service, saw this coming, writing back in June 2012:

Google, Microsoft and Apple won't just roll over and die. They will compete hard, using tight technical integration with their existing products and financial bundling to drive adoption. If this is just another feature war, this strategy will work.

If it is an architecture shift, and the opportunity is indeed for an independent cloud-based file system, the old guard's strategy, with the inevitable "installed base" driven trade-offs, will fail. The trade-offs will cripple the functionality of the offerings in a market where the best product will be the one that is file type agnostic and takes advantage of what a cloud based architecture can offer.

He's right, but also wrong. Google has enabled the tight integration of cloud storage sync into Gmail, just as he predicted. But Google also enables users to embed links to Box, Dropbox, or other storage systems. It just happens to be one-click easier with its own Drive service.

That click, I believe, will be enough.

Perhaps it won't challenge Box as much as Dropbox, given that Box is more focused on enterprise users, and a shared file system hosted in the cloud makes more sense for enterprises than home users. But it's definitely a challenge to both, as it makes content collaboration as easy as email, a collaboration metaphor that is widely understood.

Google doesn't always get things right. It fails far more often than it succeeds. But when it succeeds, as I believe it will with this integration, it succeeds at grand scale. Simplicity wins in today's tech battles, and Google just delivered up to 10GB per email of simplicity. ®

Matt Asay is vice president of corporate strategy at 10gen, the MongoDB company. Previously he was SVP of business development at Nodeable, which was acquired in October 2012. He was formerly SVP of biz dev at HTML5 start-up Strobe (now part of Facebook) and chief operating officer of Ubuntu commercial operation Canonical. With more than a decade spent in open source, Asay served as Alfresco's general manager for the Americas and vice president of business development, and he helped put Novell on its open source track. Asay is an emeritus board member of the Open Source Initiative (OSI). His column, Open...and Shut, appears three times a week on The Register. You can follow him on Twitter @mjasay.

England v New Zealand: Jeremy Guscott on final autumn Test - BBC Sport

Two matches against the big three, two defeats so far, and here come the world champions to finish things off.

England could have won against both Australia and South Africa, but the All Blacks are on a different level.

They go into Saturday's meeting at Twickenham unbeaten in their last 20 Tests overall and have won nine in a row against England.

How can England take on the world champions?

England are playing with a good tempo and they have to continue like that against the All Blacks, but they need to get more accuracy and precision into their attacking game.

Cough the ball up against New Zealand, especially in your own half and from turnovers, and they will rip you to shreds.

But you have to take the game to them and not stand off and let them dictate the pace and tempo of the game.

If you do that they will keep applying pressure until cracks start to appear, and when they finally break you open it's all over.

What do you make of the England selection?

By picking Saracens number 10 Owen Farrell at fly-half in place of the injured Toby Flood as his only change, head coach Stuart Lancaster has gone for what he knows and I pretty much agree with him.

To throw debutant Freddie Burns in from the start could be dangerous because it could go brilliantly but it could also go badly, and against the best team in the world it would be bit unfair to give him a test like that.

Farrell, who has been nominated for the International Rugby Board Player of the Year award, knows his own mind. He's not the greatest runner but he knows his limitations, he distributes well and he's nerveless when it comes to kicking at goal.

He's only 21 and his game management isn't where it's going to be as he matures; he needs a bit more of an education at 10 but once he's got that I think he'll become a good player.

There were positive signs last weekend

England's physicality was impressive last Saturday; they won the battle of the breakdown against South Africa and had the majority of both territory and possession.

England 15-16 South Africa - match highlights

They carried 119 times compared to the Springboks' 68 and made 433m compared to 169m by South Africa - looking at the stats it's a surprise England lost.

But their lack of accuracy proved crucial. England were not great in the line-out, losing five of their throws, and they also turned the ball over 16 times and dropped it eight times.

You can't do against the best teams in the world and expect to win. Repeat that against the All Blacks and they will be in big trouble.

England have to use their heads

England have to be careful how many players they commit to the breakdown on Saturday because when New Zealand defend outside their 22 they don't commit many players, unless they see the opportunity for a turnover.

They wait for one of the opposition to attack in isolation and then they pounce.

Because New Zealand don't commit many to the breakdown they have numbers when the opposition lose possession and their counter-attacks are devastating.

No doubt about the key battle

England captain Chris Robshaw has the biggest task of all because competing with All Blacks skipper Richie McCaw has been difficult for any player over the past 10 years - Robshaw will have to run himself into the ground in order to have an impact.

It's all very well England boss Lancaster talking about the tackles Robshaw has made but the flanker needs effective stats.

Metres run with the ball, turnovers won, those are the kind of stats I would like to see.

Hooker Tom Youngs also needs to play well in the line-out; he can't afford to have a success rate of 64% like he did against the Boks - for this game that rate has to be up in the 90s.

The All Blacks are a precision-tooled machine

Dan Carter pictured during a training session

Carter has shaken off injury to regain the New Zealand 10 shirt

McCaw is arguably the best player ever to play rugby union, his performances are always excellent.

But individually all the New Zealand players have a high level of skill and technical ability, and as a team they are all tuned into one heartbeat.

They are the best team in the world at executing the basics of the game with high levels of precision and if they make a mistake, they soon put it behind them.

Star fly-half Dan Carter threw an interception pass against the Scots but then flipped the switch and proceeded to rip them to shreds with his breaks.

What does history tell us?

England have a win-loss ratio against New Zealand of 19% since the first meeting back in 1905 and have lost the past nine Tests - including the last five at Twickenham - between the two.

Their last win came in Wellington back in 2003, and England's losing streak is their longest ever against the All Blacks.

The All Blacks go into the game having scored 14 tries so far on this autumn tour. England have scored eight - and seven of those came in the win against Fiji.

On the wing Julian Savea has scored 10 tries in eight matches and has never lost with the All Blacks. England counterpart Chris Ashton hasn't scored for 11 games.

Are England doomed to defeat?

Everyone has to understand where England are at the moment. It's very easy to be critical, it's harder to look at good points and positives.

Too many people are saying 'look, this side should start winning now'.

It is what it is, it's not the best team in the world - they're ranked fifth, so people should bear that in mind.

And on Saturday they're playing the best team in the world by some margin.

So who's going to win?

New Zealand will win - it just depends how well England play as to how many they lose by. I hope it's not too many.

I'll stick my neck out and say the All Blacks will win by about 10.

Thursday, 29 November 2012

Google Nexus 4 review - Inquirer


Product Google Nexus 4
Website http://www.google.co.uk/nexus/4/
Specifications 4.7in 768x1280 IPS display, Qualcomm Snapdragon quad-core 1.5GHz processor, 8MP rear-facing camera with HD 1080p video, 1.3MP front-facing camera, 3G and 802.11a/b/g/n WiFi connectivity, Android 4.2 Jelly Bean operating system, 8GB or 16GB internal storage, 2,100mAh battery, 134x69x9.1mm, 139g
Price From £239


THE NEXUS 4 is Google's latest flagship smartphone and the first smartphone to run its Android 4.2 Jelly Bean operating system. That's all well and good, but what's really special about this phone is it's low price.

It's thanks to this affordable price starting from £239 SIM-free that we predicted big things for the Google Nexus 4, as well as it's impressive specifications sheet, of course. We weren't wrong either, as the smartphone sold out minutes after its release in the UK and has been showing as sold out ever since.

We finally got our mitts on the Google Nexus 4 built by LG, so it's time to find out whether that popularity is justified.

Design
Given its bargain price, you'd expect the Nexus 4 to feel pretty cheap. However, the handset feels much more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S3 and the LG Optimus 4X HD, which both retail for around £500.

That's thanks to its minimalistic design. The front of the handset is free of physical keys and buttons, and instead consists of a single piece of glass stretching across the 4.7in screen. The back of the device comes coated in glass too, which although a nightmare for picking up grease, gives the device a high-end feel.

Google LG Nexus 4 with Android 4.2 Jelly Bean

While we love the design of the Google Nexus 4, we can't help but think it's glittery backing makes the device seem a little 'girly'. Underneath the glass on the rear of the phone, the Nexus 4 features a shimmering, almost glittery effect, which we can't see impressing the alpha males among you.

In terms of size, the Google Nexus 4 is spot on. At 9.1mm thick it's considerably fatter than the Iphone 5, but this gives the handset a reassuring bulk. It's quite comfortable to hold too, weighing a reasonable 139g.

Screen
On paper, the Google Nexus 4 features a 4.7in IPS touchscreen 768x1280 resolution and 318ppi pixel density.

The screen, although smaller than the incoming wave of gigantic screened smartphones, proved plenty big enough, and with 0.7in on the Iphone 5 it proved ideal for surfing the web and watching videos.

The display's high resolution makes for super-sharp images. We found it slightly sharper than the Galaxy S3 screen, which itself is pretty impressive. There's not a massive difference between the two smartphones, but text appears slightly crisper on the Google Nexus 4.

Next: Operating system

BBC no longer needs to broadcast a minimum of new factual programmes - The Guardian

The BBC will no longer have to broadcast a minimum amount of new factual programming on BBC1 and BBC2 after a long-established quota was abolished by the BBC Trust.

The factual quota was dropped as part of the trust's review of the way it monitors the BBC's output.

BBC trustee David Liddiment said the quota did not add anything to the trust's ability to monitor the channels' factual output because of the wide range of programmes which were defined as factual.

"Our review concluded that BBC1 and BBC2's quotas for factual programming – which covered everything from Frozen Planet to Cash in the Attic – did not add anything to our ability to govern these services effectively and needed to be removed," he said.

Liddiment said the changes were intended to make the licences "clearer and easier to understand".

"As a former programme maker, I know that setting boundaries to creativity is a finely balanced thing," he said.

"Too little structure risks creating programmes which don't hit the mark with audiences; but too much can slow down the creative process."

He added: "In particular, we took a careful look at the use of quotas or targets – a subject of much debate over the years.

"While these should never exist for the sake of it, we concluded that quotas are helpful in some areas alongside qualitative commitments.

"For example, remembering that BBC1's serious arts output nearly disappeared under a previous governance regime, we are clear that a minimum quota for arts and music on BBC1 alongside a small quota for religious programmes, is necessary."

The service licences for all of the BBC's TV channels and radio stations will be simplified and updated as part of the review, the trust said.

With digital TV switchover now complete, the references to "driving digital take-up" will be removed from the licences for BBC3 and BBC4.

The trust said the budget section would be "edited" with the licences' scope section "simplified".

Commercial radio trade body the Radio Centre, one of six organisations which responded to the trust consultation, called on the trust to "examine ways of sanctioning under-performing BBC services".

The Radio Centre said the trust should publish more regular updates on how its services were performing and should "prioritise quality before audience reach" and called on all BBC radio services to have a specific target age range.

• To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly "for publication".

• To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook.

Survey: Google Play gains on Apple App Store - PC Advisor

When it comes to which mobile application store to support, developers can factor in that Apple's App Store has the edge in volume, but Google Play -- the combined Android and HTML5 app store -- is on a growth spurt. Revenues from apps sold in the Google Play grew 17.9 percent in October compared to the previous month, while iOS App store sales shrink 0.7 percent in the same period. Compared to a year earlier, Google Play revenues grew 313 percent, while iOS App Store revenues grew 12.9 percent.

But iOS App Store revenues still were four times larger than Google Play's, according to the App Annie Index released today. The index itself is a monthly report ranking app stores by downloads and revenues, based on estimates of App Annie's tracking data. App Annie declined InfoWorld's request for specific app store revenue numbers, saying that such information is part of its paid service.

[ Want to track your own Android and HTML5 app sales? Google has the beta Google Play Developer Console for you to try out. | Subscribe to InfoWorld's Mobilize newsletter for analysis and opinions in the mobile space. ]

"The gap between global revenues on iOS and Google Play is still there," said Bertrand Schmitt, CEO of App Annie. "But the gap is shrinking every month, creating more opportunities for publishers to generate significant revenue growth on Google Play in certain regions." Google Play features digital content for Android and Web systems along with some content for HTML5 and even iOS.

When examining free downloads, App Annie found that Google Play lagged slightly behind iOS, with nine downloads of Google Play apps for every 10 iOS apps downloaded. But Google Play's free-download numbers grew 47 percent in the last five months while iOS grew just 4.5 percent.

The index also showed that Japan overtook the United States in Google Play revenue in October. Globally, the United States had accounted for 33 percent of global iOS downloads at the beginning of the year but slipped to 25.3 percent in October.

App Annie also determined that several app publishers are making more money from one or two applications than some multinational publishers earn from more than 50. Supercell, NextFloor, Kabam, and WeMade Entertainment make money from users at an "astounding rate" from a small handful of applications, App Annie reported.

In terms of revenues, the top iOS publishers last month were Electronic Arts, Supercell, and Zynga. For Google Play, the top earners were DeNA, Colopl, and GungHoOnlineEntertainment. All six top revenue-generating publishers are games builders.

The top publishers by download numbers for iOS for October were Apple, Google, and Electronic Arts. For Google Play, the top publishers by downloads last month were Google, Facebook, and Rovio.

This article, "Survey: Google Play gains on Apple App Store," was originally published at InfoWorld.com. Follow the latest developments in business technology news and get a digest of the key stories each day in the InfoWorld Daily newsletter. For the latest developments in business technology news, follow InfoWorld.com on Twitter.

Read more about application development in InfoWorld's Application Development Channel.

Badger cull: S4C rejects Welsh government Pobol y Cwm complaint - BBC News

S4C has rejected a Welsh government call to scrap a repeat of last night's episode of soap opera Pobol y Cwm.

Ministers have complained after a character on the BBC-produced TV series said the Welsh government "doesn't have the backbone" to cull badgers.

A controversial badger cull in west Wales was cancelled in March when ministers decided to vaccinate the animals instead.

S4C said it was satisfied the programme included a variety of viewpoints.

The Welsh government has written to S4C and BBC Wales, which makes the programme that has run for 38 years, claiming it breaches editorial guidelines and that the government has been denied a right of reply.

Ministers object to a storyline on Wednesday night's episode about bovine TB and a discussion about culling badgers.

"Start Quote

The BBC's editorial guidelines are clear that programmes are expected to ensure that 'controversial subjects' are treated with due impartiality in all their output"

End Quote Welsh government

They also want the episode removed from the S4C online service Clic.

The repeat is due to be shown at 18:30 GMT on Thursday.

The current storyline focuses on the soap's fictional farm, Penrhewl, where there has been a return of bovine TB.

It proves to be a tipping point for cash-strapped farmer's wife, the character Cathryn Richards, known as "Cadno", who takes a rifle out and kills one of the infected cows.

In the aftermath, she gives an interview to a local radio station voicing her frustrations about TB being found on her farm.

She claims that "the government doesn't have the backbone to sort the problem out" and that farmers are not afraid to break the law.

Later in the episode she says the government does not care about the countryside because "there aren't enough votes here".

'Due impartiality'

Another scene shows regulars in the local pub discussing the issue.

A barmaid tells the radio station, Cwm FM, that "farmers care about profits not animal welfare. They are responsible for spreading TB because they overstock. Badgers have a right to live".

"Start Quote

We are satisfied that the drama includes a variety of viewpoints which reflect the public debate about plans to eradicate bovine TB"

End Quote Dafydd Rhys S4C director of content

A Welsh government spokesman said: "Following last night's episode of Pobol y Cwm, we have made an official complaint to the BBC and S4C following what we believe to be a serious breach of BBC and Ofcom guidelines.

"We have asked the BBC and S4C to take swift action to address our concerns.

"The BBC's editorial guidelines are clear that programmes are expected to ensure that 'controversial subjects' are treated with due impartiality in all their output. We do not believe this to be the case in this instance.

"The BBC's guidelines also state that organisations criticised in programming 'should be given a "right of reply", that is, given a fair opportunity to respond to the allegations'. In this case, the Welsh government was not afforded a right of reply."

S4C director of content Dafydd Rhys said: "S4C has now received a copy of the Welsh government's complaint to the BBC regarding a storyline on last night's Pobol y Cwm.

"We are satisfied that the drama includes a variety of viewpoints which reflect the public debate about plans to eradicate bovine TB.

"Last night's episode will be repeated as planned this evening at 6.30pm on S4C, and is available to watch on demand on Clic."

The Labour Welsh government announced in March that it would not go ahead with the previous coalition government's plans to cull badgers in west Wales as part of an attempt to wipe out bovine TB in cattle.

So far more than than 1,400 badgers have been vaccinated under trials being conducted instead of the cull.

'Farcical'

Opposition parties roundly rejected the Labour administration's attempts to get the programme taken off air.

"Start Quote

The last thing that you want on the day that we're discussing the Leveson report and the freedom of the press is a government trying to say what should be the content of a TV programme"

End Quote Simon Thomas AM Plaid Cymru

Conservative shadow minister for rural affairs Antoinette Sandbach said: "This is a farcical government request that should be treated with the contempt it deserves.

"I urge ministers to get a grip and apologise to S4C for this blatant disregard to their editorial independence."

Plaid Cymru AM Simon Thomas rejected suggestions that S4C should drop the programme, which he said "reflects what has been discussed up and down Wales".

He added: "The last thing that you want on the day that we're discussing the Leveson report and the freedom of the press is a government trying to say what should be the content of a TV programme."

Liberal Democrat heritage spokesman Peter Black said he was "astonished" that Welsh Labour ministers were "starting to throw their weight about".

"Clearly they have no respect for the concept of free speech and artistic integrity," he said.

"They are acting like old-style bullies - it is as if Malcolm Tucker from [political comedy series] The Thick of It has decamped to Cardiff Bay."

Google GRINCHES have change of heart, bring back Christmas - Register

Google GRINCHES have change of heart, bring back Christmas

Android fix restores month of December

Free whitepaper – The Benefits of a Hybrid Security Architecture

Google has begun rolling out a patch for Android 4.2 "Jelly Bean" that fixes a bug that caused the month of December to vanish from the system's built-in People app.

People is the Android contact-management app, first introduced with Android 4.0 "Ice Cream Sandwich." In addition to storing the usual names, phone numbers, and addresses, it also includes a basic calendaring function that allows users to assign dates to contacts, such as birthdays and anniversaries.

With the arrival of Android 4.2, however, users began noticing an odd quirk: The People app no longer allowed them to enter any dates in the month of December. In fact, the date picker skipped the month entirely, going straight from November to January.

The bug was first brought to light by Rohit Naik, who posted a screenshot of the offending app to the Android message boards on Google Code.

Fortunately, Jelly Bean hadn't canceled Christmas entirely. Only the People app was affected by the glitch, with the date picker of the main Calendar app still behaving normally. The earlier iteration of Jelly Bean, Android 4.1, wasn't affected, either.

Even luckier still, the only devices currently running Android 4.2 are Nexus devices, including the Galaxy Nexus and Nexus 4 smartphones and the Nexus 7 and 10 fondleslabs. Because updates for Nexus kit come direct from the Chocolate Factory, these devices are usually first to receive the latest fixes.

Comparison showing the old and new Android 4.2 People app date pickers

Before and after: In Whoville they say Jelly Bean's small heart grew three sizes this day.

Sure enough, although Google never issued a public statement regarding the calendaring issue, this reporter can confirm that system updates have already arrived for Galaxy Nexus and Nexus 7 devices here at El Reg's San Francisco aerie.

Following the update, devices report their OS as Android version 4.2.1. So far, however, there's no indication that the update brings any other improvements beyond the People app calendar fix. ®

Free whitepaper – IDC: Top Five Considerations for Cloud-Based Security

Microsoft Ads Deride Google as Bad Place to Shop - ABC News

Microsoft is trying to skewer Google as a lousy holiday shopping guide in its latest attempt to divert more traffic to its Bing search engine.

The attack starts Wednesday with a marketing campaign focused on a recent change in how Google runs the part of its search engine devoted to shopping results. The revisions require merchants to pay Google to have their products listed in the shopping section.

In its new ads, Microsoft Corp. contends the new approach betrays Google Inc.'s longstanding commitment to provide the most trustworthy results on the Web, even if it means foregoing revenue. To punctuate its point, Microsoft is warning consumers that they risk getting "scroogled" if they rely on Google's shopping search service.

The message will be highlighted in TV commercials scheduled to run on NBC and CNN and newspaper ads in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post. The blitz also will appear on billboards and online, anchored by a new website, Scroogled.com.

The barbs are likely to inject more antagonism into an already bitter rivalry between two of the world's best-known and most powerful technology companies.

Google's search engine is dominant on the Internet, with Bing running a distant second. Microsoft's Office and Windows software remains an integral part of personal computers, but Google has been reducing the importance of those programs and PCs with the success of Web-based services and its Android operating system for smartphones and tablet computers.

Google still doesn't require websites to pay to be listed in in its main database. That's the index providing the results for requests entered into Google's all-purpose search box. A query made there for a particular product, such as computers, will still include results from merchants who haven't paid for the privilege of being included.

But anyone who clicks on a tab at the top for shopping-specific results will see only listings for paying merchants. That means results from sites, including Web retailing giant Amazon.com Inc., aren't displayed unless they pay. Amazon so far has only occasionally paid to have some of its wares listed in Google's shopping section. Zappos, a site owned by Amazon, has been more willing to pay the price to be listed in Google's shopping results.

Google defends the fee-based approach as a way to encourage merchants to provide more comprehensive and accurate information about what they're selling.

"I think you just get a well-organized set of product information, ways to buy it, and really have a great experience there," CEO Larry Page said during a conference call with analysts last month.

In a statement late Tuesday, Google said it's pleased with the response to the new shopping system, which offers listings from some 100,000 sellers.

Google, like Microsoft, also accepts payments for ads that are triggered by specific search terms and appear to the right or on top of regular search results. Those are labeled in gray letters as ads.

Since its inception in 1998, Google has tried to cast itself as a force for good while depicting Microsoft as a ruthless empire.

Google 'wants to dodge consent decree' in any FTC antitrust deal - Register

Google 'wants to dodge consent decree' in any FTC antitrust deal

Choc Factory reportedly trying for a wink and a handshake on antitrust probe

Free whitepaper – Gartner: Secure Web Gateway Malware Detection Techniques

Google is rumoured to be trying to persuade the Federal Trade Commission that it hasn't broken any antitrust laws and that any agreement it makes with the agency isn't bound by a consent decree.

The Chocolate Factory is looking for a light wrist-slap for its alleged search market dominance as the agency finishes up its 19-month probe of the firm's alleged monopoly.

The FTC and Google have been negotiating a settlement for the last week, and Mountain View wants that agreement to be an informal handshake sort of deal, not a formal beatdown that might hurt its business, familiar people whispered to Bloomberg.

Apparently, Google chairman Eric Schmidt was spotted with the head of the company's Washington office on Capitol Hill yesterday and chief Larry Page was also in town to meet with FTC officials.

The FTC, however, is pushing for Google to fix all of the issues the agency has with the firm's search engine or face a lawsuit, other familiar anonymous people said earlier this month, and wants the full decree.

Google's search business has been blamed for exclusive agreements with online publishers, ranking its own results higher than rivals' offerings, using customer reviews from other sites without permission and generally smiting competition whenever it can.

The internet giant is currently in talks with EU officials as well as the FTC to explain and sort out the allegations.

EU competition commissioner Joaquin Almunia has said that he's due to meet with FTC chairman Jon Leibowitz next week.

Meanwhile, federal regulators are also getting interested in how standards-essential patents (SEP) are being used by Android manufacturers to effectively protect Google's share of the mobile market.

The FTC has been looking into patents as part of its antitrust probe and the question is whether the commission can demand a settlement from Google on Android under the umbrella of unfair competition.

Patent cases are already being argued through the courts and the International Trade Commission in the US and the newest FTC commissioner, Republican Maureen Ohlhausen, has said in a separate probe that she's unsure the agency has jurisdiction to hand out decrees on patent litigation.

However the commission majority said that in "appropriate cases" it would challenge whether using SEP to get bans on products constituted unfair competition. ®

Free whitepaper – The Benefits of a Hybrid Security Architecture

Highest-ever HIV diagnoses in gay men - BBC News

The number of gay and bisexual men being diagnosed with HIV in the UK reached an "all-time high" in 2011, according to the Health Protection Agency (HPA).

It said there had been a "worrying" trend since 2007, with more and more new cases each year.

Nearly half of the 6,280 people diagnosed last year were men who had sex with other men.

Overall, one in 20 such men are infected with HIV.

Of those diagnosed in 2011, nearly two-thirds had not been to a sexual health clinic in the previous three years.

HIV

HIV stands for human immunodeficiency virus and on its own it does not kill you.

The virus can survive and grow only by infecting, and destroying, the immune system.

This continual assault on the immune system makes it weaker and weaker until it is no longer able to fight off infections.

Without treatment, it takes about 10 years from infection to the development of Aids - acquired immune deficiency syndrome.

It is then that "opportunistic infections", ones a healthy immune system could fight off, become deadly.

People can die from pneumonias, brain infections, diarrhoeal illnesses as well as certain tumours such as lymphoma and cervical cancer.

The HPA said the figures showed there was "room for improvement" in testing people in at-risk groups.

Dr Valerie Delpech, the organisation's head of HIV surveillance, told the BBC: "Obviously this is a serious illness and it is worrying that we're still seeing a lot in men who have sex with men and this is a record year.

"Transmission in the UK is largely sexual, so safe sex is the best way to prevent yourself getting HIV."

Rising

The total number of people living with HIV in the UK rose to 96,000, up from 91,500 the previous year. The issue is most intense in London.

Due to advances in drug treatment, having HIV should not affect life-expectancy. However, the data suggests that one in four people with HIV are completely unaware of the infection, meaning they cannot receive treatment and may still be spreading the virus.

The chief executive of the National Aids Trust, Deborah Jack, said: "It is vitally important that gay men test at least once a year for STIs [sexually transmitted infections] and HIV, and every three months if they're having unprotected sex with new or casual partners.

"HIV-negative gay men diagnosed with an STI should really treat it as a 'wake up call'. You are at serious risk of getting HIV in the near future and need to take steps to prevent that happening - such as consistent condom use and reduction in number of sexual partners."

Sir Nick Partridge, the chief executive at the Terrence Higgins Trust, said: "HIV is an entirely preventable condition, yet each year we see thousands more people across the UK receive this life-changing diagnosis.

"Reducing undiagnosed HIV by encouraging those in high-risk groups to test more regularly is one way we can put the brakes on the spread of infection."

Are you affected by the issues raised in this story? Please fill in the form below if you are willing to be interviewed by the BBC.

China's sex tape scandal: Zhu Ruifeng on Lei Zhengfu 'sting' - BBC News

The BBC Beijing bureau interviews Zhu Ruifeng, the investigative journalist credited with exposing a Chinese official in the midst of a sex-tape scandal.

Zhu Ruifeng might be forgiven for seeming overtired or stressed - but he is jubilant, his voice full of energy.

"I am very happy when I battle corrupt officials," Mr Zhu told the BBC in a phone interview.

Earlier this month, Mr Zhu released a videotape shot in 2007 of a 57-year-old Communist Party local boss having sex with an 18-year-old girl.

Seven days later, the official, Lei Zhengfu, a district-level party secretary from the grimy city of Chongqing, was fired.

"In the past, I was at my happiest when they threatened me and blocked my website," said Mr Zhu.

"Because then I know my reports have attacked their hearts, and my reports are genuine."

Blackmail videos

Mr Zhu has a lot to look forward to. He is preparing to release four more sex tapes, also shot inside hotel rooms, clearly showing Chongqing officials having relations with young girls.

"Start Quote

Maybe our new generation of leaders is really determined to fight corruption - maybe the sky is really changing"

End Quote Zhu Ruifeng Journalist

All five videos were recorded as part of a blackmailing scheme by a crooked property developer in Chongqing.

The developer recruited attractive, young women between the ages of 18 and 20, paying them 300 yuan ($48, £30) each time the girls secretly recorded themselves having sex with prominent Chongqing officials.

If the girls failed to get a clear view of the officials' faces on camera, they would be forced to record more sex acts until the developer had the material he needed to blackmail the city's bigwigs into giving him better deals.

The honeytrap scheme went belly-up when Lei Zhengfu, star of the first sex video, appealed to the Chongqing police for help.

The city's then-police chief, Wang Lijun, came to Mr Lei's rescue, raiding the developer's home and confiscating the videos. The property developer was jailed for a year and the young women were each detained for a month.

This year, Wang Lijun later starred in his own, separate corruption scandal, after offering US diplomats information on the Chongqing murder of British businessman Neil Heywood.

Gu Kailai, the wife of the city's disgraced former party chief, Bo Xilai, was later convicted of that murder. Wang's related misdeeds landed him 15 years in prison.

'Real journalist'

Throughout that time, the developer's secret sex tapes sat in a police vault until early November, when a mystery figure inside the Chongqing police force leaked them to Mr Zhu.

The yet-to-be-released videos all feature prominent Chongqing party bosses, Mr Zhu says.

"My source told me the developers will only target officials who have real power over construction projects. They needed to invest money and time to train these pretty girls."

Still, Mr Zhu says he wants to be absolutely sure of the identities of the people in the videos before releasing them.

"If you go ahead and spread things that could be fabricated, asking the public to check whether they are real or not, then you are not a real journalist," he said.

It is possible the Communist Party's own anti-corruption team will beat Mr Zhu to the punch, releasing information about the tapes on their own.

Chongqing's Disciplinary Committee seized the videos a long time ago, Mr Zhu recently learned, but they were reluctant to make waves inside the Communist Party by punishing any of the officials involved.

Now that the first video has been splashed all over the internet, Mr Zhu thinks the committee has no choice but to conduct an open investigation pointed at the four remaining officials.

"Some people think the Party's attempt to deal with its own corruption problems is like beating your right arm with your left arm," Mr Zhu said.

"In our system, anti-corruption measures have to involve the participation of the people. You cannot do it behind closed-doors using illegal procedures."

'Changing' sky

Originally from Henan province, Zhu Ruifeng now lives with his family in Beijing, mostly working alone on his anti-corruption website, Supervision by the People.

Starting in 2000, he worked as a print journalist, filing stories for Fang Yuan, a state-run magazine sponsored by the People's Supreme Court.

But in 2006, Mr Zhu struck out on his own, realising he would be more content to publish his own scoops.

Well before the Chongqing sex scandal, Mr Zhu's site registered some big wins. In 2007, he posted articles highlighting problems with the administration of vaccines in China's central Shanxi province.

Slowly, other Chinese media outlets picked up on the story, linking the vaccines to deaths and illnesses in children living in the northern part of the province.

In 2010, the country's Health Ministry released the results of its own investigation, disputing multiple reports that improperly stored vaccinations had resulted in adverse reactions in children.

However, the investigation uncovered some irregularities in the way in which vaccines were labelled in the province, and one Shanxi health official was also caught embezzling 270,000 yuan from the vaccine supplier.

Other Chinese media outlets picked up on the story and six months later, China's Health Ministry confirmed that three children had been made sick by vaccines in Shanxi.

The Chinese government has refused to blame the vaccines for the other children's deaths and illnesses.

Since then, Mr Zhu's site has also exposed corrupt officials in Liaoning and Shanxi provinces, resulting in at least two firings.

In each of those scandals, Mr Zhu received anonymous threats and his website was temporarily blocked.

During this sex tape scandal, though, his site has been left untouched.

Mr Zhu believes that it is a sign that China's new government, led by Xi Jinping, might be different from their predecessors.

"Maybe our new generation of leaders is really determined to fight corruption," he said. "Maybe the sky is really changing."

Microsoft's Bing attacks Google in new TV ads - NDTV

Microsoft is trying to skewer Google as a lousy holiday shopping guide in its latest attempt to divert more traffic to its Bing search engine.

The attack started Wednesday with a marketing campaign focused on a recent change in the way Google operates the part of its search engine devoted to shopping results. The revisions require merchants to pay Google to have their products listed in the shopping section.

In its new ads, Microsoft Corp. contends the new approach betrays Google Inc.'s longstanding commitment to provide the most trustworthy results on the Web, even if it means foregoing revenue. To punctuate its point, Microsoft is warning consumers that they risk getting "scroogled" if they rely on Google's shopping search service.

The message will be highlighted in TV commercials scheduled to run on NBC and CNN and newspaper ads in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post. The blitz also will appear on billboards and online, anchored by a new website, Scroogled.com.

The barbs are injecting more antagonism into an already bitter rivalry between two of the world's best-known and most powerful technology companies.

Google's search engine is dominant on the Internet, and Bing runs a distant second. Microsoft's Office and Windows software remains an integral part of personal computers, but Google has been reducing the importance of those programs and PCs with the success of Web-based services and its Android operating system for smartphones and tablet computers.

Google doesn't require websites to pay to be listed in its main database, the index that provides results for requests entered into its all-purpose search box. A query made there for a particular product, such as a computer, will still include results from merchants who haven't paid for the privilege of being included.

But that's not the case for someone who clicks on a tab to enter Google's shopping-only section, which is designed to compare prices and offer other insights such as identifying sites that offer free shipping. Searches there are confined to paying merchants. That means results from sites, including Web retailing giant Amazon.com Inc., aren't displayed unless they pay. Amazon has only occasionally paid to have some of its wares listed in Google's shopping section. Zappos, a site owned by Amazon, has been more willing to pay the price to be listed in Google's shopping results.

Google defends the fee-based approach as a way to encourage merchants to provide more comprehensive and accurate information about what they're selling.

"I think you just get a well-organized set of product information, ways to buy it, and really have a great experience there," CEO Larry Page said during a conference call with analysts last month.

In a statement, Google said it's pleased with the response to the new shopping system, which offers listings from some 100,000 sellers.

Google, like Microsoft, also accepts payments for ads that are triggered by specific search terms and appear to the right or on top of regular search results. Those are labeled in colored letters as ads. The same distinctions aren't made in Google's shopping section.

Since its inception in 1998, Google has tried to cast itself as a force for good while depicting Microsoft as a ruthless empire.

But Google is less cuddly now that it's established itself as the Internet's main gateway --and a well-oiled moneymaking machine. The Mountain View, Calif., company's search engine is so influential that government regulators in the U.S. and Europe are investigating whether Google has been stifling competition by giving special preference to its own services in search results.

Microsoft, which faced its own antitrust inquiries more than a decade ago, is among the companies that prodded the investigation of Google. This time, it's pouncing on Google for straying for from its own principles.

Google began limiting its shopping-only results to paying merchants in mid-October. The change coincides with what is expected to be the most lucrative holiday shopping season on the Web yet. The amount of money a merchant pays is one factor that influences the order of the shopping results, although Google says it still places the highest priority on each listing's relevancy to a user's request.

Google discloses that it receives payments in small print at the bottom of the shopping results page. The notice is also visible if a user clicks on a link at the top of the shopping results page, under the heading: "Why these products?"

What's left unsaid is the omission of sites such as Amazon, which tends to offer some of the best deals on the Web.

The financially driven system for determining the results in a major part of Google's search engine breaks new ground for a company whose idealistic founders, Page and Sergey Brin, once railed against the perils of allowing money to influence which Web links to show.

Brin and Page preached about the issue in academic papers that they wrote about search while conceiving Google as Stanford University graduate students. They also delved into the topic when they outlined Google's "don't be evil" creed in a letter written to potential investors before the company went public in 2004.

"Our search results are the best we know how to produce," Brin and Page wrote in the letter. "They are unbiased and objective, and we do not accept payment for them."

Microsoft contends that Google is doing a disservice to its users with the new approach, as many users may not even realize that the results in shopping search are being swayed by money.

"We want consumers to know, in contrast to the route that Google has pursued, we are staying true to the DNA of what a good search engine is really about," said Mike Nichols, Bing's chief marketing officer. "We will rank results on what's relevant to you and not based on how much someone might pay us."

Danny Sullivan, an Internet search expert who has been following Google since its inception, believes Microsoft is highlighting an important issue. "Google deserves to take its lumps on this," said Sullivan, who now works as editor of SearchEngineLand.com. "I have been surprised by how little attention this issue has gotten so far because it's a 180-degree turn for Google."

Sullivan doesn't think Bing's shopping results are pristine, either. He points to Bing's partnership with Shopping.com, which also requires merchants to pay to be in its listings. Some of Shopping.com's data is fed into Bing's shopping section. When Shopping.com gets paid by a merchant for sale funneled through Bing, Microsoft gets a slice of the revenue.

While all that is true, Bing's shopping section consists mostly of listings from merchants that haven't paid for the privilege, said Stefan Weitz, Bing's director.

That's so, Weitz said, even though Bing isn't currently accepting listings from new merchants that want to appear in its shopping results. The only way a new seller can get into Bing's shopping search engine is to sign up for Shopping.com's fee-based service. After the holiday season, Bing's shopping-only section once again will accept free listings from new merchants, Weitz said.

Like Google, Sullivan said Microsoft isn't doing a good job disclosing the role that money plays in its shopping-only results. He thinks that issue could undermine the effectiveness of Bing's anti-Google ads.


Wednesday, 28 November 2012

BBC Trust rejects complaint about report of Paul Dacre's Leveson evidence - The Guardian

When BBC News correspondent Nick Higham suggested Daily Mail readers had "prejudices" it prompted a complaint that went to the corporation's highest echelons.

The BBC Trust's editorial standards committee reached for the Oxford English Dictionary to ascertain whether Higham, in a report about Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre's evidence to the Leveson inquiry, had been unfair to readers of middle England's favourite newspaper.

A single complainant contacted the BBC to say that Higham's report for the BBC1 10pm news bulletin on 6 February had inaccurately reported Dacre's evidence and that the use of the word "prejudices" had done his readers a disservice.

In these "politically correct times", said the unidentified complainant, words had evolved to carry a different, non-dictionary definition.

He added: "I think we all know that the word 'prejudiced' is a perfect example of this."

But the trust's editorial standards committee, the final arbiter of appeals at the BBC, rejected the charge.

The ESC said Higham's report was accurate and had not breached guidelines on due accuracy or impartiality.

Higham's report began: "He's the man who runs Britain's second biggest daily with ferocious drive and a natural feel for his readers' prejudices – though he prefers to call them anxieties."

Higham continued: "Paul Dacre rarely appears in public, but today he came to the Leveson inquiry ..."

The report followed Dacre's evidence to the inquiry, which included an exchange with Robert Jay QC in which the lead counsel to the inquiry had asked the Mail editor whether he empathised with his "readers' fears and prejudices".

Dacre replied: "Anxieties' rather than 'prejudices' is the word I'd use."

The complainant said the report had inaccurately reported Dacre's evidence and led to the suggestion that Mail readers were prejudiced in their views.

The BBC, in its response, said the word "prejudiced" had not been used and was not the same thing as "having prejudices", which could be "mildly pejorative".

The committee of BBC trustees considered the Oxford English Dictionary definitions of "prejudices" and it was "noted that these definitions encompassed both the complainant's and the BBC's interpretations".

It decided that it was "reasonable" for the word to have been used, reflecting a "certain set of preconceived views" held by readers of the Daily Mail.

"Readers of other papers, meanwhile, would have had different sets of preconceived views or 'prejudices'," concluded the committee.

"The reporter [Nick Higham] was describing what Mr Jay and Mr Dacre had said and that, on this basis, he did not express an opinion that Daily Mail readers were particularly prejudiced."

• To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly "for publication".

• To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook